Clarifying user request
I think we should verify the information using the network, but since we don’t have a browser, we can use curl or wget. I need to be concise and focus on accuracy. It might be better to ask the user for clarification about their request—are they looking for an article or a summary? Given the sensitivity around claims, like someone being arrested, it’s wise to ask if they want me to fact-check this first. This way, we can proceed responsibly.Asking about user needs
I need to clarify what the user wants: do they want an article, a profile, or help verifying a headline? If it's an article, I should ask about the tone and length they prefer. I could draft a neutral profile focusing on a coaching career and achievements, like the 1992 Barcelona Olympics. I remember that the Chinese women's basketball team won silver under coach Li Yaguang, but I need to make sure I have the details right about the final match and the teams involved.Drafting response options
I want to clarify the options for the user: 1) Do they want a 1000-1500 word article (narrative or profile)? 2) Should I create a timeline and verify each source? 3) Would they like it rewritten for a video script or public account style? 4) Or just fact-checking?
Since there are sensitive claims like being "arrested," I should suggest verifying with official sources first. I can check online, but I’ll need their permission to do so. If not, I can still write based on general knowledge, avoiding unverified claims.
这是个标题风格的提法。你希望我做哪种处理？
- 写一篇人物稿（叙事/公众号风，字数自定）
- 做生平与事件时间线梳理，并尽量给出公开来源
- 改写成短视频口播稿
- 先做事实核查，确认“被抓”等说法的权威来源与表述
提示：涉及“被抓/被查”这类指控，建议先核验权威报道再撰写。我可以联网检索（如新华社、纪检通报/体育系统通报）再给出结论与出处。要不要我先做联网核查？如果直接写稿，也可以，只会用谨慎表述（不写未核实指控）。